<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Purew.in &#187; Media Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://purew.in/category/technology/media-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://purew.in</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Media Center Mark I</title>
		<link>http://purew.in/technology/media-center/media-center-mark-i/</link>
		<comments>http://purew.in/technology/media-center/media-center-mark-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TomCap]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purew.in/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well my first build of an XBMC media center has been a learning process. The software appears relatively straight forward but as you dig deeper with customization it gets murkier. Topping it off my hardware has been less then stable. But before I get to the complaints, lets go over the basic specs. This motherboard [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://purew.in/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/IMG_8263.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-479" title="IMG_8263" src="http://purew.in/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/IMG_8263-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>Well my first build of an XBMC media center has been a learning process. The software appears relatively straight forward but as you dig deeper with customization it gets murkier. Topping it off my hardware has been less then stable. But before I get to the complaints, lets go over the basic specs.</p>
<div style="width:350px;height:125px;margin:0px auto;">

		<div class='et-custom-list etlist-dot'>
			<ul>
<li>AMD A6-3500 Llano 2.1GHz FM1 65W Triple-Core APU</li>
<li>ASRock A75M-ITX FM1 AMD A75 Mini ITX</li>
<li>SAMSUNG 830 Series 64GB SATA III Solid State Drive</li>
<li>Kingston HyperX Blu 4GB RAM</li>
</ul>
		</div> <!-- .et-custom-list --></p></div>
<p>This motherboard is one of very few FM1 Mini ITX boards. It did receive very good reviews despite my issues, to be documented in the future. But performance-wise this build has proven very snappy. Windows install/updates take a strangly long time, but normal use is very snappy, and boot up time is fantastic (less then 25 seconds till your in XBMC). The SSD goes a long way towards this, and its also very good for quickly accessing fan art. Everything runs very smoothly.</p>
<p>The case I purchased from an importer located in Connecticut. Built in Hong Kong. Its a brushed aluminum Mini ITX with room for a slot loading optical drive. It also came with a remote. The remote worked well but didnt have adequate buttons to use XBMC. The slot loader fits a left had eject button, which is very rare. The blue ray drive I installed has the left hand eject, but some reason the button itself doesnt function. This has nothing to do with the case. Its not a huge deal as this was a refurb (cheap) and I&#8217;ve only used it twice since I built it.</p>
<p>To replace the remote that came with the case I purchased the NYXBoard. When working, its fantastic, however the RF transmitter seems incredibly weak. In fact, I had to plug it into the front USB ports because the 10 inch difference was weakening the signal too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://purew.in/technology/media-center/media-center-mark-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Quick Cache is NOT caching this page, because `$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']` indicates this is a `/feed`; and the configuration of this site says not to cache XML-based feeds. -->